The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), passed in India in 2019, has ignited a firestorm of debate. This legislation fast-tracks citizenship for undocumented immigrants belonging to specific religious minorities from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. While the government portrays it as a humanitarian act, critics argue it fundamentally undermines India's secular character and discriminates against Muslims. This article talks about the contentious provisions of the CAA, analyzing its potential impact on the delicate balance of India's secular fabric and the rights of its minority communities. 

Historical Context of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) passed in December 2019 marks a pivotal shift in India's approach to citizenship, with significant implications for the country's religious minorities, particularly Muslims [1]. At its core, the CAA provides a fast track to Indian citizenship for non-Muslim migrants from neighboring Muslim-majority countries—Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan—thereby institutionalizing a religious criterion for citizenship that has not previously been part of Indian law [1]. Critics argue that this shift reflects the growing influence of Hindutva constitutionalism, a political ideology that seeks to redefine India in terms of Hindu heritage and culture, and which now informs state policies, including those related to citizenship [2]. The legal apparatus established by the CAA, together with the National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the National Population Register (NPR), reflects a centralization of state control over citizenship matters, raising concerns about the potential for widespread disenfranchisement of Indian Muslims who, unlike their non-Muslim counterparts, do not benefit from the CAA's protective provisions [2], [1], [3]. This Muslim exclusionary aspect of the CAA has sparked considerable controversy and led to large-scale protests, raising questions about the law's compatibility with the secular principles enshrined in the Indian constitution [4], [1].

How has the citizenship law evolved prior to the amendment?

Building on the premise that the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) is a reflection of Hindutva constitutionalism, it is crucial to understand the evolution of India's citizenship laws prior to the latest amendment. The Citizenship Act of 1955, which laid the foundation for determining who can be considered an Indian citizen, has witnessed multiple amendments that have incrementally shaped the country's citizenship policies. A significant turning point was the 2003 amendment under the National Democratic Alliance government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which introduced the concept of "illegal immigrants" — a term that specifically targeted individuals who either entered India without valid travel documents or overstayed their permitted duration [3]. This amendment went further to declare these individuals, as well as their children, ineligible for Indian citizenship by registration or naturalisation [3]. Marked by far-reaching revisions, the 2003 amendment, as per and [3], was a pivotal moment in shaping the legal framework toward a more exclusionary approach. The definition of illegal immigrants, as detailed in [3], became a cornerstone for the subsequent policy discourse, setting the stage for future legislation that would further narrow the path to citizenship along religious and nationalistic lines.

What prompted the introduction of the CAA in 2019?

The introduction of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in 2019 by the Modi government can be traced back to the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) commitment laid out in their 2019 manifesto, signifying the party's dedication to providing refuge to religiously persecuted minorities from neighboring countries [5]. Upon its passage by the Parliament in the same year, the Act became a defining element of the BJP's legislative agenda, showcasing the government's prompt response to its pre-election promises [5]. Specifically, the CAA was designed to offer a legal pathway for Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, Parsi, and Christian migrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan—who had arrived before December 31, 2014—to apply for Indian citizenship, thereby acknowledging and addressing the plight of these individuals who had faced persecution on grounds of religion in their home countries [5]. This move was not only about fulfilling a political promise but also about establishing a humanitarian framework to support those who, without this amendment, would have been considered "illegal" immigrants, thus enabling them to integrate into Indian society with dignity and security [5].

Provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) represents a significant alteration to the Indian citizenship framework initially established by the Citizenship Act of 1955 [6]. This amendment, which has been in force in certain districts across nine states, marks a departure from the universal application of the citizenship criteria by introducing a religious qualifier for eligibility [7]. Specifically, the CAA fast-tracks the citizenship process for non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan, identifying six religious minorities—Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians—as beneficiaries if they fled to India due to religious persecution or the fear of such before December 2014 [7],. This creates a legal pathway for these individuals to obtain Indian citizenship from the date of their entry into the country, effectively bypassing the previous label of 'illegal migrant' that would normally be applied to undocumented entrants [3].However, this legislative change, passed by the Indian Parliament on December 11, 2019, has raised concerns over its potential to create a religious test for citizenship and the possible disenfranchisement of Indian Muslims, given that the same expedited process is not available to Muslim migrants [6],.

Which groups does the CAA specifically aim to benefit?

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) specifically caters to individuals from Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian communities who have faced persecution on the grounds of their faith in their countries of origin—Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan,[8]. These individuals, having suffered due to their minority status in these predominantly Muslim countries, are the focus of the CAA's provisions that aim to streamline their path to Indian citizenship,[8]. By explicitly naming these religious groups, the Act underscores the Indian government's commitment to offering sanctuary to those who have historically endured religious oppression, thereby granting them a chance to rebuild their lives within the secure bounds of a nation that recognizes their plight [8], [3]. Significantly, the Act sets a cut-off date, stipulating that only those migrants who entered India on or before December 31, 2014, are eligible under its provisions [8], ensuring a manageable scope for the application of its benefits. The CAA, thus, acts as a legislative intervention to afford protection and stability to specific religious minorities, acknowledging the severity of their situation through the legal mechanism of expedited citizenship [8].

How does the CAA propose to change the criteria for citizenship?

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) significantly alters the framework of Indian citizenship, especially in how it proposes to change the criteria for citizenship based on religious identity and country of origin. Central to this is the introduction of Section 6B, a provision which aims to streamline the process for non-Muslim migrants from specific countries—Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh—to become Indian citizens [9]. Under this Act, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian migrants from these countries are identified as eligible for citizenship, provided they entered India on or before December 31, 2014 [9]. This marks a departure from the previous stipulation that required 11 years of residency, as the CAA proposes to relax this requirement to just 5 years for these communities [3]. Furthermore, the Act proposes exemptions for these migrants from penalties for illegal entry or overstaying visas, as outlined by the Foreigners Act, 1946 and the Passport Act, 1920, thus negating the usual route of deportation or imprisonment for other illegal immigrants [3]. By introducing these provisions, the CAA represents a significant shift in policy, as it effectively incorporates religious and nationality considerations into the legal structure governing citizenship in India [6].

The CAA's Impact on India's Secular Ethos

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) has stirred significant debate over its alignment with the secular values enshrined in the Indian Constitution, raising concerns about the preferential treatment of certain religious groups. By introducing religion as a criterion for expedited citizenship, the CAA effectively transgresses the secular promise that citizenship should be conferred irrespective of religious identity [10]. This amendment upends the foundational principle of a universal, religion-neutral citizenship, which has been a cornerstone of the Indian democratic fabric [10]. Furthermore, the Act creates a tiered system of citizenship pathways, favoring non-Muslim religious minorities from specific neighboring countries, thus challenging the secular ethos of the nation as articulated in the Constitution [10]. The CAA, when viewed in conjunction with the proposed National Register of Citizens (NRC), seems to lay the groundwork for potential exclusion of Muslims, suggesting a state-sponsored project of "othering" that is at odds with the country's secular commitments [11] [10]. These developments have led to widespread protests and unrest, signifying the centrality of secularism as a unifying principle of the Indian state, and bringing to light the fears that the CAA could be a stepping stone towards transforming India into a Hindu nation-state in contradiction to its secular constitution [10] [11].

How does the CAA affect religious minorities in India?

Building upon the growing centralization and the politics of Hindutva constitutionalism that characterize the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), it is essential to understand the law's specific impact on religious minorities in the region. The CAA 2019 has created a pathway to Indian citizenship for migrants from three neighboring Muslim-majority countries—Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan—but only for those who identify as Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian [12]. This selective approach to offering refuge is based on the assertion that these religious minorities face persecution in their home countries and therefore need protection [13], [11]. Critics, however, argue that the CAA, by excluding Muslims, discriminates against a significant religious group and thereby contradicts India's secular tradition of protecting all minorities [12], [13]. The exemption from being classified as 'illegal migrants' is granted to non-Muslims under this act, which has led to widespread concerns and protests, particularly in regions like Delhi, Aligarh, and Lucknow, where the exclusion of Muslims is perceived as a direct challenge to India's secular ethos [12], [10]. Furthermore, this exemption is only applicable if the individuals in question can prove their origins from the specified countries and have resided in India for five years, thus creating a legal framework that both accommodates and segregates based on religious identity [12], [11].

What are the potential long-term effects of the CAA on India's secular identity?

Building upon the legislative revisions to the Citizenship Act, the enactment of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) has sparked intense debate over its implications for India's secular fabric. Critics of the CAA argue that it actualizes an exclusivist, ethnic, Hindu nationalism that echoes the ideology of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), an organization that has long advocated for a Hindu Rashtra (nation) [14]. This emphasis on Hindu nationalism inherently undermines the secular principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution, as the CAA appears to create a pathway to citizenship for non-Muslim refugees from neighboring countries, thereby implicitly relegating Muslims and other minorities to a potentially marginalized status [14]. The fear that the CAA is a step towards realizing the goal of Hindutva, which is to establish the supremacy of Hindus, is further exacerbated by concerns that Muslims and Christians could be relegated to second-class citizens in their own country [14]. While the long-term effects of the CAA on India's secular identity are a subject of uncertainty and depend on the intent of the government and its implementation, the mere potential for discrimination on the basis of religion is seen by many as a betrayal of India's secular ethos [11]. Moreover, the CAA's lack of explicit protection for those who have faced religious persecution suggests a selective approach to offering refuge, which could be interpreted as a deviation from the non-discriminatory principles that have historically governed India's approach to citizenship [11].

Responses to the Citizenship Amendment Act

The public outcry against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in India has been both significant and sustained, with the streets of many cities witnessing large-scale demonstrations. The intensity of the protests, which have been ongoing since December 2019, underscores the deep-seated discontentment with the act [15]. Crowds comprising hundreds of thousands have gathered to voice their opposition, uniting under a common banner of dissent against what they perceive to be a discriminatory and unconstitutional piece of legislation [16]. This mass mobilization has not only highlighted the contentious nature of the CAA but has also significantly backfired for the government, exacerbating the societal rifts between those who support the act and those who stand firmly against it [17]. In many instances, these protests have been met with a heavy-handed response from the authorities. There have been numerous reports of clashes between police and protestors, with the police often resorting to violent tactics in an attempt to quell the unrest [16]. This aggressive strategy, however, seems only to have fueled the fires of opposition, as the reverberations of dissent continue to be felt throughout the nation [17].

How have international bodies and foreign governments reacted to the CAA?

The international community has raised significant concerns over the implications of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in India. Prominently, the European Union has been vociferous in its critique, with over 150 members drafting a resolution against the CAA, which they fear will precipitate the largest statelessness crisis the world has ever seen [18]. This concern is echoed by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who has described the CAA as 'fundamentally discriminatory' [18]. The resolution, drafted by 154 members of the European Parliament, not only criticizes the CAA for its potential to create a vast humanitarian crisis but also marks the Act as a dangerous pivot in India's approach to citizenship determination,[18]. This stance is bolstered by the international human rights framework, as stipulated by various covenants, which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on racial, ethnic, or religious grounds [18]. The reaction from international bodies, such as the UNCHR and the OHCHR, reflects a deep concern about the discriminatory nature of the CAA and asserts that it undermines India's commitments to equality before the law, as well as its international obligations to civil and political rights and the elimination of racial discrimination,[18]. The global outcry against the CAA, thus, is not a mere diplomatic formality but a substantial alarm over the deviation from established human rights norms and the potential for widespread disenfranchisement and marginalization.

What legal challenges have been made against the CAA?

In the wake of the significant changes brought about by the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, legal challenges swiftly followed. The Supreme Court of India became a battleground for the contestation of the act's constitutional validity, with a staggering number of 60 petitions being heard by the apex court [18]. Reflecting the urgency and importance of the issue, a specific hearing was scheduled for the 22nd of January, 2020, to deliberate on the act's alignment with the constitution [18]. Despite the clamor for intervention, the Supreme Court, under the stewardship of Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde, refused to stall the implementation of the CAA, allowing it to take effect even as debates and protests raged across the country [18]. Kerala, marking a significant moment in the legal history of the nation, became the first state to mount a direct challenge against the central government over the CAA, invoking Section 131 of the Constitution, which empowers the Supreme Court to adjudicate disputes between states and the Union [18],. The state’s bold move underscored its contention that the CAA was a blatant transgression against the secular ethos enshrined in India’s Constitution, with Kerala's Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan declaring his state's unwavering commitment to safeguarding citizens' rights and upholding the constitution [18],.

The CAA and Minority Rights

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) has introduced significant changes to India's citizenship legislation, raising considerable concerns about its impact on the country's minorities, particularly Muslims. By providing a pathway to citizenship for persecuted minorities from neighboring countries, the CAA selectively includes Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians, but conspicuously excludes Muslims, effectively instituting a 'religion test' for citizenship [3]. This exclusionary criterion has been condemned by various human rights groups, including the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which has labeled the Act as "fundamentally discriminatory" [3]. The potential consequences of the Act extend beyond mere discrimination; with the looming implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the National Population Register (NPR), there is a palpable threat of mass deprivation of nationality, particularly for Muslim populations who may struggle to meet stringent documentary proofs of citizenship [19]. Moreover, the CAA's religious discrimination is seen as a violation of India's constitutional values of equality, drawing criticism for its role in legitimizing discrimination based on faith [20]. The cumulative effect of these measures risks disenfranchising and marginalizing India's Muslim community, which forms a substantial portion of the nation's demographic fabric [21].

What implications does the CAA have for minority protection under international law?

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) has sparked a complex debate about minority protection under international law, particularly concerning religious minorities. Mirroring the intent of the Lautenberg Amendment in the United States, which offers a pathway to immigration for individuals fleeing religious persecution, the CAA similarly grants expedited citizenship to non-Muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan who have come to India to escape such conditions, [22]. This aligns with the Modi government's defense of the law as a humanitarian act meant to aid those who have been persecuted based on their religious beliefs,[20]. However, the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) and other critics have raised alarms, labeling the law as discriminatory because it explicitly excludes Muslim migrants from the same protections, [22]. This exclusion raises profound concerns in terms of minority protection under international legal frameworks, as it appears to undermine the principle of non-discrimination by singling out Muslims, who constitute a significant religious minority in India [22]. Therefore, while the CAA aims to protect certain minorities, it has also ignited fears that its implementation may contravene established international norms designed to safeguard all minorities from discrimination.

What are the potential consequences for minority communities not covered by the CAA?

While the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003, marked a significant shift in India's citizenship policy, the subsequent amendment in 2019 has sparked concerns over its potential consequences for minority communities not covered by the legislation. Particularly, the CAA may serve to undermine the status of these minorities, potentially exacerbating their vulnerability [23]. The implementation of the CAA, coupled with the National Register of Citizens (NRC), could notably increase the influence of Hindu majoritarian forces in the political landscape, thereby reducing the role and significance of minority communities in the nation's socio-political fabric [23]. This is especially problematic for Muslims in the country, who, under the CAA-NRC package, may be disproportionately targeted as potential foreigners, while non-Muslims are afforded a form of "shield" by being able to claim that they were migrants fleeing persecution [3]. This distinction is predicated on the Indian government's stance that Muslims in Muslim-majority countries are unlikely to face religious persecution, a stance that overlooks the discrimination and persecution experienced by non-Muslim populations in these countries despite constitutional guarantees of their rights [3]. Critics argue that the exclusion of Muslims from the benefits of the CAA could be rooted in anti-Islamic sentiment, a concern that further complicates the already contentious nature of the Act [3]. Moreover, minority communities from countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan are explicitly excluded from the eligibility for citizenship under the new CAA, which reinforces the perception that Muslims from these countries cannot be treated as persecuted minorities by the Indian government [3]. This could potentially lead to situations where these communities are not recognized as indigenous but rather declared as foreign, subjecting them to possible discriminatory actions and exacerbating their marginalization [23]. Therefore, the CAA's selective coverage raises serious questions about the equitable treatment of minority communities and the future of secularism in India's democracy.

Conclusion:

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) passed in India in December 2019 has been a highly controversial topic, with significant implications for the country's religious minorities, particularly Muslims. The CAA institutionalizes a religious criterion for citizenship that has not previously been part of Indian law, providing a fast track to Indian citizenship for non-Muslim migrants from neighboring Muslim-majority countries. This shift in India's citizenship policy reflects the growing influence of Hindutva constitutionalism, a political ideology that seeks to redefine India in terms of Hindu heritage and culture, and which now informs state policies, including those related to citizenship. The legal apparatus established by the CAA, together with the National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the National Population Register (NPR), reflects a centralization of state control over citizenship matters, raising concerns about the potential for widespread disenfranchisement of Indian Muslims who do not benefit from the CAA's protective provisions. Critics argue that this shift represents a significant alteration to the Indian citizenship framework, potentially exacerbating the vulnerability of minority communities. The implementation of the CAA, coupled with the NRC, could notably increase the influence of Hindu majoritarian forces in the political landscape, thereby reducing the role and significance of minority communities in the nation's socio-political fabric. Furthermore, the CAA's religious discrimination has been criticized as a violation of India's constitutional values of equality, drawing criticism for its role in legitimizing discrimination based on faith. The CAA has sparked a complex debate about minority protection under international law, particularly concerning religious minorities. The exclusion of Muslims from the benefits of the CAA could be rooted in anti-Islamic sentiment, a concern that further complicates the already contentious nature of the Act. The international community has raised significant concerns over the implications of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in India, with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) labeling the Act as "fundamentally discriminatory." The Supreme Court of India became a battleground for the contestation of the act's constitutional validity, with a staggering number of 60 petitions being heard by the apex court. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the law's specific impact on religious minorities in the region and its implications for India's secular fabric. Future research should focus on the potential consequences of the CAA on minority communities and India's socio-political landscape.

References

1. Factsheet on The Citizenship (Amendment) Act in India. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.uscirf.gov 
2. Making Sense of India’s Citizenship Amendment Act 2019: Process, Politics, Protests | IFRI - Institut français des relations internationales. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.ifri.org 
3. Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizenship_(Amendment)_Act,_2019 
4. Columbia University Libraries. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from blogs.cul.columbia.edu 
5. What is Citizenship Amendment Act? Here's all you need to know about CAA rules. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.businesstoday.in 
6. Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024 explained: What you need to know. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.business-standard.com 
7. TOI Explains: What changes now that CAA rules are notified. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from timesofindia.indiatimes.com 
8. What Is Citizenship Amendment Act 2019? Know Eligibility, Deadline, Areas Exempted . (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from news.abplive.com 
9. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.thehindu.com 
10. In defence of Indian secularism. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.hindustantimes.com 
11. Everything you wanted to know about the CAA and NRC | India Today Insight. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.indiatoday.in 
12. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.thehinducentre.com 
13. Citizenship Act is an extension of and commitment to the idea of secularism. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from indianexpress.com 
14. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from berkleycenter.georgetown.edu 
15. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from berkleycenter.georgetown.edu 
16. The controversy behind India’s Citizenship Amendment Act. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.ibanet.org/article/CB835381-29A6-40DB-894D-CC77BFBA07E2 
17. Analyzing global response to the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.orfonline.org 
18. Citizenship Amendment Act protests. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests 
19. HRC43 – MRG raises alarm at the discriminatory nature of the CAA in India. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from minorityrights.org 
20. India Announces Steps to Implement Citizenship Law That Excludes Muslims. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.voanews.com 
21. India implements ‘anti-Muslim’ 2019 citizenship law weeks before election. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.aljazeera.com 
22. CAA long overdue, say Indian American groups. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.deccanherald.com 
23. (n.d.) retrieved March 12, 2024, from www.thehindu.com