Introduction to Res Gestae and Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act

Res Gestae is a Latin term that means "things done" and refers to the facts that form part of the same transaction or event [1]. These facts are considered to be automatically or naturally connected and are the acts that speak for themselves [2]. In Indian law, Res Gestae is recognized under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which discusses the relevancy of facts that form part of the same transaction [1].

Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act provides that facts which are not in issue but are so connected with the facts in issue that they form part of the same transaction are relevant [3]. The intention of the lawmakers behind Section 6 was to avoid excluding relevant evidence that could not be brought under any other section of the Indian Evidence Act [4]. This section is based on the English common law doctrine of Res Gestae, which allows for the admission of certain statements made during the course of a transaction as evidence [5].

Res Gestae includes elements that fall outside the definition of modern hearsay, such as circumstantial evidence of a state of mind [2]. An example of Res Gestae can be seen in the case of Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan, where the deposition made by the father of the accused, who made a phone call to the police station to inform them of the crime committed by his son, was considered as part of Res Gestae and admissible as evidence [6]. In the case of Western India Theatres Ltd. it was observed that the statement of law in Section 6 of the Evidence Act is usually known as Res Gestae [7]. Therefore, Res Gestae plays a crucial role in the Indian legal system and allows for the admission of relevant evidence that would otherwise be excluded.

Types of Evidence that can be presented under Res Gestae

Res Gestae, which means "forming part of the same transaction," is an important concept in legal proceedings in India [8]. Under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, evidence may be given of facts that form part of the same transaction as the fact in issue [1]. This means that facts that are closely connected with the fact in issue and form part of the same transaction are admissible as evidence [4]. Res Gestae is significant because it allows for the admission of evidence that may not be admissible under other rules of evidence [3].

Statements made during the occurrence of the event are one type of evidence that can be presented under Res Gestae. These statements can be spontaneous declarations made by a person promptly after an event and before the human mind has an opportunity to conjure a false statement [3]. Additionally, things said or acts done in the course of the transaction, including gestures, can also form part of Res Gestae [2]. The rationale behind admitting such evidence is that the statements made during the occurrence of the event are considered to be more reliable as they are made at a time when the witness is under the influence of the excitement caused by the event [4].

Physical sensations of the witness are another type of evidence that can be presented under Res Gestae. For example, if a witness feels pain or experiences shock during the occurrence of the event, their physical sensations can be considered as part of Res Gestae [2]. This type of evidence can be particularly useful in cases where the witness is unable to express themselves verbally, such as in cases involving infants or individuals with communication disabilities [9]. Overall, Res Gestae plays an important role in legal proceedings by allowing for the admission of evidence that may not be admissible under other rules of evidence.

Criteria for Admissibility of Evidence under Res Gestae

Res gestae is a legal principle that refers to the facts that form part of the same transaction or event [2]. It is an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence, as it allows for the admission of statements made by individuals that are admissible as evidence because they are spontaneous and part of the same transaction [5]. Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act defines res gestae as something that is spontaneous or part of the transaction [10]. Therefore, for evidence to be admissible under res gestae, it must meet certain criteria.

Firstly, the actions or statements made by the witness must be spontaneous and not premeditated [8]. This means that the witness must not have had time to reflect on what they were going to say or do, and their actions or statements must be a natural response to the event or transaction. For example, if a witness spontaneously screams out in response to a sudden and unexpected event, such as a car crash, their statement may be admissible under res gestae [11].

Secondly, the evidence must be related to the event or transaction in question [1]. The statement or act must be closely connected to the event and must provide an explanation or clarification of the event. For instance, if a witness spontaneously points to a person who committed a crime, their statement may be admissible under res gestae if it is related to the event and provides an explanation of what happened [7]. Therefore, for evidence to be admissible under res gestae, it must be spontaneous, related to the event, and not premeditated.

Examples of Evidence that can be presented under Res Gestae

Res gestae, which means "things done" in Latin, is a legal principle that allows the admission of evidence that is incidental to the main fact and explanatory of it. This principle is embodied in Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act and is commonly referred to as the res gestae doctrine [2]. The evidence presented under res gestae must be made by a person who witnessed the event and must be so closely connected to the main fact that it forms part of the same transaction [1].

Examples of evidence that can be presented under res gestae include statements made by a victim during a crime, cries for help made during an accident, and the sound of a bullet being shot [12]. These statements and sounds are considered spontaneous and made during the course of the event, and are therefore admissible under res gestae.

Res gestae is an exception to the hearsay rule of evidence, which refers to an assertion made by a person other than the one giving oral evidence in court [6]. The principle of res gestae allows for the admission of unprompted remarks about an occasion or transaction, which were made by a person who had personal knowledge of the facts [11]. The res gestae principle is an important tool for courts to ensure that relevant evidence is presented and considered in making a just decision [2].

How Res Gestae Evidence is Presented in Court

Res Gestae is a legal principle that allows the admission of evidence that is part of the same transaction as the fact in issue. This means that facts that are connected with the event in question and have happened immediately before or after the event can be presented in court [1]. Res Gestae evidence can include physical reactions to an event, such as shaking or crying, as well as direct testimony from the witness [8]. This principle is based on the English common law doctrine of the same name and is codified in Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act [5].

Despite being hearsay evidence, Res Gestae evidence is admissible in court because it forms part of the same transaction as the fact in issue. In Babulal v W.I.T Ltd, it was held that the statement of law in Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act is usually known as Res Gestae and is applicable in cases where the evidence is connected with the fact in issue [6]. However, whether the evidence is reliable or not depends on the circumstances of the case [2].

When presenting Res Gestae evidence in court, the opposing counsel has the right to cross-examine the witness to test the reliability of the evidence [12]. It is important to note that Res Gestae evidence is only admissible if it is relevant to the fact in issue and forms part of the same transaction [1]. The principle of Res Gestae is an important tool for lawyers in presenting evidence in court and allows for a more complete picture of the events in question to be presented to the judge or jury [13].

Limitations of Res Gestae Evidence

Res gestae evidence is admissible in court under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act. However, there are limitations to the admissibility of such evidence. The judge or jury must evaluate the evidence to determine its reliability and trustworthiness [2]. The statement must be spontaneous and made at the time of the event, and not after the event has occurred. The statement must be made by a person who has personal knowledge of the event and not by someone who heard about it from another person [2].

The evidence must be relevant to the case for it to be admissible under Section 6. The facts must be so connected with the fact in issue that they form part of the same transaction [1]. In Babulal v. W.I.T Ltd, it was observed that the statement of law in Section 6 of the Evidence Act is usually known as Res Gestae [8]. The section, along with others, refers to the rule of admission of evidence relating to what is commonly known as res gestae. It is an exception to the hearsay rule [14].

The evidence must also be reliable and trustworthy. Decided cases have shown that certain criteria must be fulfilled before a statement can be admitted into evidence under Section 6 [15]. The statement must be made by a person who has personal knowledge of the event and not by someone who heard about it from another person. Additionally, the statement must be spontaneous and made at the time of the event, and not after the event has occurred [11]. In conclusion, while res gestae evidence can be admissible under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, it must meet certain requirements to be considered reliable and trustworthy evidence in court.

Landmark Cases Involving Res Gestae Evidence

Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is based on the doctrine of Res Gestae, which allows for the admission of certain hearsay evidence in court [16]. The doctrine of Res Gestae holds that facts that are so connected with the facts in issue that they form part of the same transaction are relevant and admissible as evidence [5]. The principle embodied in law in Section 6 is usually referred to as the Res Gestae doctrine. The facts that can be proved as a part of Res Gestae must be facts other than those in issue but must be connected with it [2].

Kesar Singh v. State of Haryana is a landmark case involving Res Gestae evidence. In this case, the Supreme Court held that Res Gestae evidence cannot be used to prove the guilt or innocence of an accused person. However, it can be used to corroborate other evidence and to establish the context in which the crime occurred [16]. Another important case is State of Punjab v. Karnail Singh, where the Supreme Court laid down the standard for determining the admissibility of Res Gestae evidence. The Court held that the intention that Section 6 requires must be related not only to the bodily injury inflicted but also to the clause of the transaction which is the subject matter of the trial [17].

In Babulal v. W.I.T Ltd, the court observed that the statement of law in Section 6 of the Evidence Act is usually known as Res Gestae. Res Gestae has been interpreted to mean facts which may be proved as part of the transaction itself, and which are so closely connected with it as to form part of the same transaction [8]. It is important to note that Res Gestae evidence is subject to the same rules of admissibility as any other evidence, and it is up to the court to determine whether or not it is relevant and reliable [2]. In cases where admissible evidence is ignored, it is the duty of the appellate court to re-appreciate the evidence, even where the accused has been acquitted [18].

Differences between Res Gestae and Hearsay Evidence

The Indian Evidence Act recognizes two types of evidence: Res Gestae and Hearsay Evidence. Res Gestae is an exception to the hearsay rule of evidence and refers to spontaneous declarations made by a person during the course of an event or immediately after it [3]. Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act explains the principle of Res Gestae [2]. The doctrine of Res Gestae is based on the idea that statements made in the heat of the moment are likely to be truthful and reliable [12]. In State of Maharashtra v. Damu, the Supreme Court held that Res Gestae evidence is admissible as it forms a part of the original transaction and is contemporaneous with the occurrence [2].

The main difference between Res Gestae and hearsay evidence is the source of the information. Res Gestae is based on first-hand experiences, while hearsay is based on second-hand information [1]. Res Gestae is spontaneous and not premeditated, while hearsay can be planned or calculated [6]. Although hearsay evidence is not admissible, it may be admissible in a court of law when it is Res Gestae and may be reliable proof [2].

In conclusion, the notion of Res Gestae is explained in Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, and it is an exception to the hearsay rule of evidence [19]. Hearsay evidence refers to the statement by a person who has not himself seen the happening of the transaction, but has heard about it from others [1]. The principle of Res Gestae is an exception to the rule that hearsay evidence is no evidence [5]. Therefore, it is important for lawyers and judges to understand the differences between Res Gestae and hearsay evidence when presenting or evaluating evidence in a court of law [7].

Importance of Res Gestae Evidence in Criminal Investigations

Res Gestae evidence plays a crucial role in criminal investigations as it is considered more reliable and trustworthy than hearsay evidence. While hearsay evidence is not admissible in court, it may be admissible when it is res gestae and is considered reliable proof [2]. This exception to the hearsay rule is based on the principle that statements made during the course of an event are likely to be truthful and accurate [8]. The trustworthiness and reliability of the statement or conduct is crucial in determining whether it can be considered as res gestae evidence [11]. As a result, res gestae evidence is often relied upon in criminal investigations as it provides valuable information about the events leading up to a crime.

Res Gestae evidence is particularly helpful in establishing a timeline of events, which is essential in criminal investigations. The principle of res gestae is an exception to the rule that hearsay evidence is no evidence [5]. Statements and acts that are contemporaneous in nature can be considered as part of the same transaction and can be admitted as res gestae evidence [6]. This allows investigators to piece together the sequence of events leading up to a crime, which can be crucial in determining the guilt or innocence of a suspect.

In addition to providing crucial information about the events leading up to a crime and establishing a timeline of events, res gestae evidence can also provide insight into the motive behind a crime. Res gestae literally means 'things done' and refers to the facts of the transaction that are explanatory of an act or show a motive for it [7]. The statement of law in Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act is commonly recognized as Res Gestae [20]. Therefore, res gestae evidence can be an essential tool for investigators in building a case against a suspect and ensuring that justice is served.

Conclusion: The Significance of Res Gestae Evidence in Legal Proceedings

Res Gestae evidence plays a crucial role in establishing the truth and ensuring justice is served in legal proceedings. Under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, Res Gestae evidence is admissible only if the testimony is established to be part of the same transaction, and the court must determine if it is valid or not [20]. Res Gestae evidence refers to unprompted remarks about an occasion or transaction, and it can provide key evidence that leads to the identification and prosecution of suspects [11]. As such, Res Gestae evidence is an important tool for lawyers and judges in determining the facts of a case.

The significance of Res Gestae evidence lies in its ability to provide evidence that is not otherwise available. Res Gestae evidence can be used to establish the context of a situation and to provide a more complete picture of events [2]. This is particularly important in criminal cases, where the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime. Res Gestae evidence can help to establish the necessary link between the accused and the crime, thereby strengthening the prosecution's case [5].

If you are looking for Comprehensive notes: Download Notes from here

Here is a list of subjects included in the study material:

Invest in your legal education today with LegalStix Law School's digital product notes. Empower yourself with knowledge, excel in your exams, and pave the way for a successful legal career.